[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <op.stu6ypvf8yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1DseMz-0006y1-Kd@mother.fishpool.fi> <op.stu6ypvf8yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Hello!

With the WCOWORK option, none of these assumption are true. If some codereceives a WM_SIZED message, it cannot know if the data are the FULL area orthe WORK area (because maybe another lib -- considered as the same AESapplication -- may have requested the WCOWORK mode... or not.

I think your application have a big problem if you use a library and youdon't know what the library do ... or vice versa. It's a thing you shoulddefinitly avoid if you design something.



Regards,
Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

References:
- [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Joakim Högberg" <gokmase@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] [Mint-cvs] [FreeMiNT CVS] lib/gemlib
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[3]: usage of wind_calc()
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread