[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNT/GCC Obsevation

To: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT/GCC Obsevation
From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:20:34 +0200
Cc: Mint List <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <jeoe88gffk.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1123540263.11037.8.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <jeoe88gffk.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Andreas Schwab píše v Út 09. 08. 2005 v 01:46 +0200:
> Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com> writes:
> 
> > I just checked out the Debian 68k list archive and it looks like they
> > are still on gcc 2.95.4.  But I didn't know there was a gcc 2.95.4....

> AFAICT gcc 4.0.x appears to be in a fairly good shape on m68k.

BTW, Debian is searching for someone who would be maintaining m68k
related gcc bugs in debian and forwarding them to upstream (which is
Andreas :-)

Petr

References:
- [MiNT] MiNT/GCC Obsevation
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT/GCC Obsevation
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] obsolete aout binutils?
Next by Date: [MiNT] what's wrong with this code?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT/GCC Obsevation
Next by thread: [MiNT] what's wrong with this code?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread