[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS

To: <jan.thomas@bt.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:01:50 +0200
Cc: <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F46D9FC@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> (jan thomas's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:45:58 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F46D9FC@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

<jan.thomas@bt.com> writes:

> Yes it was without. Whats the benefit of MP anyway? (I know what
> its supposed to do, but from a practical point of view) I cant 
> use it on the CT60, and everything runs OK on the TT without 
> it...???

If all your programs are bug free then MP will not give you any
advantage. :-) But once you have a program that scribbles over random
memory you will like the bit of safety that MP gives to the rest of the
system.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
  - From: <jan.thomas@bt.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread