[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
From: Arnaud BERCEGEAY <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:48:03 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1134077699.19887.190.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4397F4C3.7030701@utbm.fr> <1134069883.19887.135.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <1134073679.4398974f7d0ba@webmail1.utbm.fr> <1134077699.19887.190.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.1.20060mdk (X11/20050322)

Hello,

How about instead of a new message, you just tell the AES "Hey, I'm not
stupid, don't send me an extra WM_MOVED with your WM_SIZED messages".


Seems very good to me.

We just need "something" to tell the AES that any of xywh may be changedin WM_SIZED.



best regards,
Arnaud.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" <Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr>

References:
- [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" <Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread