[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:43:20 +0200 (GMT)
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: 00037215.018b7e3a2de8@smtp.freeola.net
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00037215.018b7e3a2de8@smtp.freeola.net>
Reply-to: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:28:08 , Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk> wrote:
> To try to dig deeper into my network problems with 1.16
> I thought I would try ping'ing my router with different
> sized packets.
>
> Before testing 1.16 I did a sanity check with 1.15.12
>
> The largest packet that worked was 1472 bytes. Anything
> larger and there was no repsonse.
>
> I am going to try again with 1.16 but I just wondered if
> this was normal sort of behaviour for ping ?`

1.16 behaves in the same way so it looks like it might
be a problem with ping.

Peter

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
  - From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread