[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:37:20 +0200 (GMT)
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: 165747A1-2026-4EAB-9180-4A13D486734B@bassment.nu
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <165747A1-2026-4EAB-9180-4A13D486734B@bassment.nu>
Reply-to: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:00:04 , Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu> wrote:
>
> > I don' think it is happening with all jpegs.
>
> Maybe only with progressive jpegs? Just a wild guess, could be a
> starting point. :o)
>
> Maurits.

Hmmm...

The only flaw with that theory is that the downloaded Highwire binary
displays the images correctly.

I also tried compiling 68000 and 68020-60 versions,

Regards,

Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
  - From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] JPEG Lib
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread