[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native

To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:09:32 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0712121353000.25664@shell.boerde.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1197412048.5211.34.camel@localhost> <475FD3B8.7090100@freesbee.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0712121353000.25664@shell.boerde.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Frank Naumann a écrit :

Most probably he need to increase the stacksize of the binaries(that's important, otherwise the binaries crash due to missing stacksize).

Furthermore, GCC 4 is known to really eat memory... Some issues will befixed in the next versions.

This can really be a problem on MiNT platforms.
Sigh... I will probably never see GCC running on my old ST...

Vincent

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>

References:
- [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
Next by Date: [MiNT] GCC and MagiC
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 native
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread