[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[MiNT] Alignment
To
: mint <
mint@fishpool.com
>
Subject
: [MiNT] Alignment
From
: Vincent Rivière <
vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr
>
Date
: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:05:59 +0100
List-help
: <
mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help
>
List-id
: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner
: <
mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi
>
List-post
: <
mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe
>
Sender
:
mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent
: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Let's talk about alignment !
Question 1: On a standard TT or Falcon with 68030, is it faster to do a
move.l to an address multiple of 4 than to an address not multiple of 4 ?
-- Vincent Rivière
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [MiNT] Alignment
From:
Patrice Mandin <mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr>
Re: [MiNT] Alignment
From:
MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Re: [MiNT] Alignment
From:
Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Re: [MiNT] Alignment 2
From:
Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Prev by Date:
Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
Next by Date:
[MiNT] SRPMS for GCC 4.2.2 and Binutils 2.18
Previous by thread:
Re: [MiNT] Pending patches & mailing list archive
Next by thread:
Re: [MiNT] Alignment
Index(es):
Date
Thread