[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3

To: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:07:49 +0000
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <c6533ef60802060054x657477d8ld4d5a632782ee307@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c6533ef60802051618w1ee05126sf66358ac67512dfc@mail.gmail.com> <1202287159.9668.1.camel@localhost> <c6533ef60802060054x657477d8ld4d5a632782ee307@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:54 +0100, MiKRO wrote:
> 
>         You can't specify two -m (machine) models on the same
>         commandline. You
>         have -m68060 and -m68020-60.
> I thought so, however, I expected it will be the same as with gcc --
> the last option counts. Any idea how to build 060-gcc/binutils then?
> As I said, now I use make CFLAGS=... to add that -m68060 flag.

Search and remove the original m68020-60 flag.

Alan.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>

References:
- [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Efika
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread