[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[MiNT] Fork behavior (forkpty)
To
: mint <
mint@fishpool.com
>
Subject
: [MiNT] Fork behavior (forkpty)
From
: Peter Persson <
pep.fishmoose@gmail.com
>
Date
: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:23:40 +0200
In-reply-to
: <1216575200.20735.0.camel@localhost>
List-help
: <
mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help
>
List-id
: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner
: <
mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi
>
List-post
: <
mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe
>
References
: <
000aad4c.019a88caa1d2@smtp.freeola.net
> <1216575200.20735.0.camel@localhost>
Sender
:
mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Hi ppl,
I'm experiencing some weird stuff when using forkpty(). It seems to
hog much more cpu than if I just start the same number of processes.
Can anyone shed some light on this subject?
Have a nice summer :) -- PeP
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [MiNT] Fork behavior (forkpty)
From:
Adam Kłobukowski <atari@gabo.pl>
References
:
[MiNT] What's happening ?
From:
Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Re: [MiNT] What's happening ?
From:
Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
Prev by Date:
[MiNT] Console Fonts (a bit O.T. maybe)
Next by Date:
Re: [MiNT] Fork behavior (forkpty)
Previous by thread:
[MiNT] Console Fonts (a bit O.T. maybe)
Next by thread:
Re: [MiNT] Fork behavior (forkpty)
Index(es):
Date
Thread