Re: [MiNT] Supexec taking one VBL?

[Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>]

on 9/9/08 8:10 AM, Miro Kropacek wrote:

> Oh yes, I'm aware of that. I'd like to find some compromis -- it should be
> something very easy to implement and what's even more important, totally
> hidden for programmer who wants to run his app also under TOS. Probably some
> mintlib call wrapper could do this but question still is what to do with that
> handlers... For example, on Amiga is quite nicely done -- the OS supports
> exactly this, you define your function, the parameter it should take when the
> function is called (the most usable is some pointer), call something like
> registerMyVblHandlerDefinedByThisStructure() and here we go. It's managed by
> OS but user can define what he wants.

Correct me if I'm wrong but amiga has no standardized memory protection for
quite sometime.  Which leads to my next question, do they even have an MMU
mapping setup to protect any areas of memory at all?

Another solution, is the instruction... Please reboot without mint to use
this program.  Maybe not the most elegant, but very simple.  ;-))

Also, maybe it's just me, but I find the html replies hard to follow because
of the awful formatting. Would it be to much to ask to not use html or at
the very least set it to use colors to differentiate who says what?

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/