[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:31:02 +0100
In-reply-to: <8cf5b8cc0812260209k328f370j88ae2a30644698d3@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <3312992540.1174087984@192.168.178.12> <C577F521.151F4%atari@bright.net> <8cf5b8cc0812260209k328f370j88ae2a30644698d3@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

David Galvez píše v Pá 26. 12. 2008 v 11:09 +0100:

> Which one is more advanced now? oVDI or fVDI? If fVDI is the most
> advanced and seeing that there are few developers left, wouldn't be a
> better idea to make it the default free VDI for MiNT so less work must
> to be done?

I don't know anything about oVDI. As for fVDI we use it in ARAnyM's
AFROS for 7 years without major problems and I think the fVDI is also
included in CT60's modified TOS. It also has several hardware
accelerated drivers available.

Petr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
  - From: "Johan Klockars" <johan@klockars.net>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
  - From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
- Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
  - From: "David Galvez" <dgalvez75@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread