[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] ethernat download speed

To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] ethernat download speed
From: "Miro Kropacek" <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:25:36 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=XG+1q7e4Lxi28hX5MDOb13/CjvQIjaLNSRDxeGLBdtw=; b=f7VJKC74HChQebG/7TKOXV/bQJzIKaDUQRaIyaiQ0+W/wcr1Wok33jxxxxzHn+ffRH SbQ0lS41z3fvIUwyLhi2VcJyAjd9fnU4HhAOUf1nVjaEr25YXHt/8eSk/IU4cRcPZYRW ScLR+jJzmRIdEsE69zwZVFAXsduMrniofrUwo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HHin7SJOWOvts8MiXMYXi+2vuqhEktP4QUvCXw4QvFJdDKtZFcWuhFvWg/F/I6HqKO sWAzyLjWrPyMsbNMZPqJHwiJWk8uEJdp+XPVpPH7Rrd/9d9meI3F5YdVRal+QqbjKjhN Qy1RF0QAyNDzJrjScEe5CL0S86PUFZYus0REg=
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

hi all,

today I spent quite a time with testing one strange bug which appeared as LAN setup issue but in the end it's something more critical. My problem was yesterday I had to transfer ~200 MB file to my falcon and I noticed it takes a little bit more time than I used to get. After some measurements, it was clear my download speed mystically lowered at hundreds of KB instead of thousands of KB... after numerous tests I'm able to say this:

- latest freemint + old ethernat.xif by nature -- OK
- - // -               + r1.2 from cvs compiled against gcc 2.95 -- OK
- - // -               + latest cvs revision (with alan's patch for hang up) compiled against gcc 2.95 -- BAD
- - // -               + r1.2 from cvs compiled against gcc 4.3.2 + binutils 2.18 -- BAD (!!!) [here I left libkern still compiled with 2.95]

OK = 1.5 MB/s, BAD = 500 KB/s and lower (mostly about 200 KB/s)

I've made some other tests but I'm quite tired to verify them once again. Could you please someone verify this? Maybe it's happening only on my machine (bad luck? ;-) I test it with laptop running ubuntu+proftpd and freemint running commandline client. I always swapped only ethernat.xif, everything other stay.

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] ethernat download speed
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Commandline handling in the kernel
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] ethernat download speed
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Commandline handling in the kernel
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] ethernat download speed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread