[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE

Am 14.12.2009, 07:24 Uhr, schrieb Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>:


is this one part of the KM that need to be reworked. I would say a
file pointer should be enough, but only if its "siganure" says its not
run_km should return some value, that can be referred to later. I don't know how to do this. 

Just filename sucks, but before it was even worse.


already loaded. Can the filename be used in combo with app_id, or is
that strictly AES only..

What circumstance should it be possible to load two modules that are
the same. Certain other kernels do allow this if the KM handles
multiple "things".


Future!


I thing there may be a need for a functioning KM skeleton (or similar)
to allow co-exist, order and unload testing, including km reloading

would a modprobe type tool for MiNT be of any use?


What's that?

-Helmut