[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies

To: mint Mailing-List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:19:26 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=yDTJ1JmXaZxiBhtMmvdPyLDsR7EkMPRfi4iuQQyGQ8E=; b=wUpdShVQWouVY9fmy/IsBfKf4j64102dSDOe8JDrjQQmCZG/R10Go9rstj0dGbTcEg OxklItoJt/kkHbjf02HvOetv6l9Ihg1bPswFPaQ6YCmloqKLMZKCoUaQnYHIAeXkYT3E gC1bzJMBeOFhzBF3UxMlBazRBXs+15LII4c8A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=K4QFgBIX4le9ZCFZxINjgKB0njzudaqUtKmgx4gDY7Mtm8qaUlI7e/bBsSFGvNZQVZ EfMbJgfYt+Doy3i+5FYbImvItT5ug4xpxtr3hKNvly3meNZaAUexiRe5KRFfXv95VXq5 /zfIGhOS581VtHjV79MHa0TP8dcL2BFoXvl2M=
In-reply-to: <4B686BD9.2030501@online.no>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com> <c6533ef61002020705h7e2c02ccke004dffd384887bd@mail.gmail.com> <BB743878-0329-4246-B41E-4996D8E02B21@gmail.com> <4B686BD9.2030501@online.no>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

2 feb 2010 kl. 19.15 skrev Jo Even Skarstein:
> I agree. While the overlay/module-system may work perfectly fine, it's
> still a patch/hack. Even worse, if such a system is becoming popular
> then it may restrict kernel development to maintain compatibility with
> this "hack".

My feelings exactly. Now I've given some more thought to this, and decided that I'll touch LDG the day it becomes part of the OS. Prior to that, I'd rather stick to SLB - even if it's considered to be dead.

-- PeP

References:
- [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Daily freemint kernel builds
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] how to compile stik/sting stuff with gcc4
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Next by thread: [MiNT] Re : LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread