Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice

To: George Nakos <ggn@hol.gr>

Subject: Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice

From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:56:43 +0200

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m/VcknfLyEa6kwHRznZBZktqyB0ul/ItDZB16OsG4YU=; b=OhN+jIJpRiwlKO9qc8/s2RjO4GGyADe65KZ05C1FNipf0//hWoMx2xVpU7FT7K08BB y/OoEj5/t392hk/+WlaB4/sPAnvD+xRuqHqlU/v+dFFrumweDaqT0D+kEgHiLIIkl+7j IqK5lsw4xHoZJOd7nAQeuvB1xjQxZd8XljlBo=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=toqBsk7AHWDttzwOAUzZbSfX1CYgzbVWM7zFlgWu9ElDNTC8TglNxF7e05X4qqz5DY eDBhsBwmcGUXF9Lqd5Az5MwVJU6MOb3n5uDFG5zJE6U5/hAOGaF/yq1pnWk3JPKqFOV9 fJ2/rMoJ3MZcxVnEam2P+fnOVKea7aFXG9TqA=

In-reply-to: <1613445297.20100426213515@hol.gr>

List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>

List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>

List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>

List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>

References: <000a93b2.018392621f0c@smtp.wanadoo.fr> <1613445297.20100426213515@hol.gr>

Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Btw, this is something I clearly remember be discussed maybe 5 years ago here at mint list but I totally forgot the result as it turned out into a big flame war :)

Some people believes Reply-To: should be set to SENDER. To me it looked always strange exactly because of reasons mentioned. But, recently I had to setup ctpci user and dev mailing lists and guess what? There was an option for exactly this -- sender / list / explicitly specified address. I was so-so close to changing it to "sender" but then I noticed a note where it's STRONGLY advised to keep it at "sender" option.

Do you have someone an idea why it's so great to have To: <sender> ? To my naive look there are only disadvantages.

http://mikro.atari.org

Follow-Ups:

Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice
- From: "J. F. Lemaire" <jflemaire@skynet.be>
Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice
- From: xavier.joubert@free.fr
Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice
- From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>

References:

[MiNT] Messages received twice
- From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>
Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice
- From: George Nakos <ggn@hol.gr>