Re: [MiNT] 32-bit FreeMiNT kernel

[Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>]

On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:02:08 , Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr> wrote:
> Miro Kropacek wrote:
> > I just wanted to know your opinion on this, is it any good, except
> > good feeling we're 32-bit? :)
>
> 32-bit will be slower on ST (but who cares ?),
> 16-bit is slower on ColdFire.
>
> Anyway, unlike x86, we always have 32-bit pointers, that's the most impor
> tant.
>
> I think your 16/32-bit reflexion is just about increasing the size of the
>
> parameters of some API functions, where it matters. This could probably
> easily implemented as additional function calls, without breaking the
> existing compatibility.
>

Could this be used on Milan or Hades or is their TOS too far from
CT60 TOS ?

Peter