Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib / Kernel Future and also SpareMiNT.....

[Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>]

Hi,

On Sunday 30 May 2010, Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 09:48 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> > There could be two pages.  One "wishes for kernel" that is open for
> > everyone and another one a roadmap which is closed for editing (could
> > come e.g. from version control).
>
> The roadmap belongs in the bugtracker. So does the feature list. If 
> these systems are kept separate, it's much more work to move features
> from the wish-list to the roadmap and then into the bugtracker.

Right!  That's a much better way to work than what I suggested. :-)

One can also open a bugzilla entry for a new feature just to tell that
he's working on one and attach a patch to integrate once its ready.


> A bugtracker tool ('bugtracker' is really not a good name, as it's used to
> manage features as well) makes life a lot easier if you have a long term
> plan with the project.

Well, bug can be "doesn't to X".  Or would "issue" be better name for that
than "bug"?


	- Eero