Re: [MiNT] Hoard alternative malloc

[m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>]

Am Freitag, den 11.06.2010, 00:54 +0200 schrieb Henk Robbers
<h.robbers@chello.nl>:
> If you had not used copy/paste but in stead had written
> 1 funcion with 2 parameters (count, chunk) you wouldnt
> have made mistakes and it wouldnt have taken me precious
> time asking myself where the hell are the differences.

Ok, sorry for 1 error in 1 test. ;) But that doesn't mean that hoard isn't
much faster... as you can see by the tests ( the ones that really did
malloc the size that they should malloc...) 

greets,
Ole