[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB
From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:05:12 +0200
In-reply-to: <21072010203548i2C00391FDP0@gmx.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <21072010203548i2C00391FDP0@gmx.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5

On 07/21/2010 08:29 PM, Gerhard Stoll wrote:
>> what happens when editobjc.slb is loaded under anything else than MagiC?
> 
> It will not work. The EDITOBJC.SLB install the the new AES 
> functions (opcode 0xD2 until 0xD9) for the edit object in a way, 
> which is only present in MagiC.

But is any harm done? Or is the SLB clever enough to not do anything if
MagiC is not present? Personally I've patched Jinnee to not look for it.

Btw that editobject is pretty useful. It would be a nice addition to XaAES.

Jo Even

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB
  - From: Gerhard Stoll <gerhard_stoll@gmx.de>

References:
- [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB
  - From: Gerhard Stoll <gerhard_stoll@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] FreeMiNT CVS mail list
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Conholio 0.7r
Previous by thread: [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] EDITOBJC.SLB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread