[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks

To: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:45:05 +0200
Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=DTDkpTY1+lfzUe18RCgkzS/oH+nv+7TN7h8bVdGfPHM=; b=bRLv17b2o29mEKrssQ7idFsm49byJNBa25FqSwO7Kwrp+upjNzIKJ1TjBWmvOWjZ3R i8dd0nux0p7DPupou6tC0oSKxrI89ZPCuscG9fx+0Ca2udZuR0qbNdhE578o3YK0dLg+ fvUj1x5y0Q5pvzws4PSJht4MmpkGtFZUAcRjk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=RV3ycpp6+j8mwB361TPWuyvQlPtZVMGghG+ij/xGbPLmgm7h4iv+lCRody1zmhCRR6 e1CIj5gX6vqtwi7U41GN7YRHVMGnJ21865/yD77dqK5IYmR+TWFVRIXnPM1aYJYEDBA1 SUOIv+wR5vkLaZuXUqgLy43TZP1ltMYDHCYwQ=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikTc-eaSaL8IKdZXUjafgaunjJXankZZ49jRCtS@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C416CA5.2030508@online.no> <201007172108.p55789@wun.maus.de> <AANLkTikTc-eaSaL8IKdZXUjafgaunjJXankZZ49jRCtS@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

18 jul 2010 kl. 09.23 skrev Paul Wratt:

> I do know of software that has been released in the past 12-18 months
> that is TOS/MiNT/MagiC/Geneva compatible in a single binary, therefore
> I know it is possible to NOT "safely ignore Geneva"

I'd say it's safe to ignore Geneva and MagiC. I've stopped supporting them, they're closed source, no longer developed and dead. I support FreeMiNT & XaAES/MyAES, and I want more people to use them.

Unless you write a library which handles the functionality lacking from Geneva & MagiC... then I'd support them, of course.

-- PeP

References:
- Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- [MiNT] GEM frameworks
  - From: Ekkehard_Flessa@wun.maus.de (Ekkehard Flessa)
- Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
  - From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread