[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug

To: <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:28:46 +0200 (EET)
In-reply-to: 1281950253.17330.5.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1281950253.17330.5.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:17:33 , Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure where we're at with this bug, but it definitely sounds like
> Peter's setup is saving the files to a different location that Peter
> thinks in 1.17. But in 1.16 it's in the location he expects.

I'm going to give it a try with another archive that I never unpacked
after checking that there are none of its files anywhere, then I launch
a search on all the partitions and come and report.
>
> Now, is this repeatable with other extractors ? ZIP, LHA, ZOO etc ?

Yes. Tested, at least, with LZH & TAR.
>
Regards,

J.-Luc

References:
- Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT + Taskbar
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread