[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug

To: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:44:48 +0100
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <0007a716.019d5262bf18@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1281950253.17330.5.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <0007a716.019d5262bf18@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 13:35 +0200, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:17:33 , Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure where we're at with this bug, but it definitely sounds like
> > Peter's setup is saving the files to a different location that Peter
> > thinks in 1.17. But in 1.16 it's in the location he expects.
> >
> Got it! files are extracted to /opt/toswin2/ folder!
> Any sense to this ?

Probably.

But I need the parameters which are passed to the extractor to get a
real test case.

Alan.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
  - From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
  - From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] ramdisk bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread