[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Kernel documentation shortcomings
- To: ole@monochrom.net
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] Kernel documentation shortcomings
- From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:29:15 +0200
- Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dYx5O2V1xgNacQRVZMs5jFyckzVb/2RbJ3YUsR8SWX0=; b=Blx/lE8z6umEUk/jCJO1BnhVkyfPHkCIMdAJk89IURcQy49kEIvNX58CnunB1Q7A05 JGFBo548NUaC2AC633Mb/YYCFzE53kabMChEQmaPAghe5e4O8zFp2HCXQSZHEHXAaDXH m3xJdzRC+YiVmJzQE0glj05RTt3OrHj7F5QS4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ieyNhYS4ypYcCg3fh405ZXtRJm9SVXV7JSO/SRgAhlKji5ByylmM5C7LFPxZLvLdZo rwsEQpaafvL18Qf1v1E6QSBN8yzHW39+EpMxXznmLuyPHYd66o/UXDPr5OkxI1HgCslu VBSxdsRfF7Anxv7iMcqC2SaKFhiZeFEJMqj+Y=
- In-reply-to: <3759792c800da494ef8704b557b712d6-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYJXVxoB1E6XF1XQ0AEWl1eRg==-webmailer2@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
- List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
- List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <3759792c800da494ef8704b557b712d6-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYJXVxoB1E6XF1XQ0AEWl1eRg==-webmailer2@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
> Is this info up to date? Is int still 16 bit when compiling an kernel for
> freemint?
Yes
> Wasn't -mshort removed from kernel compilation?
No
> About number 3 ("function returns a value it will be returned in register
> d0"):
> Is that true? At least not for floating point results, right?
Yes, it is, floating point isn't used in kernel.
> What do others think, will it make sense to release an "1.17 beta / rc" -
> with such an outdated documentation?
I think this can be taken as part of "are we going to include any
significant (other than READMEs) doc at all?". Wiki is progressing
fairly well, we just need to solve an export to some static html form.
--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org