[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Fileselector

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:21:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <053f779f639eb3fb516c75e5fcede369-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXV5aUV8WW19oAFFTMl5dSEUEWFhcQlE=-webmailer1@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Thread-index: AcuMebcJyJ2b/g77akm9a/Scl3icpQ==
Thread-topic: [MiNT] Fileselector
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.27.0.100910

on 11/25/10 3:08 AM, m0n0 wrote:

> Am Do, 25.11.2010, 08:43 schrieb Jo Even Skarstein:
>> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 22:49 -0800, WongCK wrote:
>> 
>>> But will not be reinventing Selectric or boxkite ?
>> 
>> That would be a good thing. Selectric, Boxkite and Freedom 1 are all
>> excellent fileselectors, but don't use them with MiNT/XaAES.
> 
> Whats so bad about boxkite? I never had visible problems with it running
> under XAAES/FreeMiNT... at least I didn't know that boxkite was the bad
> boy when bad things happened...

Not sure what the exact technical reason is, but the file selector
replacements should never be used with XaAes (kernal module).

They are ok with NAES though.

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
  - From: WongCK <wongck68@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
  - From: "m0n0" <ole@monochrom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Fileselector
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread