[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk

To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk
From: Jean-Luc CECCOLI <Jean-Luc.Ceccoli@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:33:06 +0200 (EET)
In-reply-to: 1292873052.1863.12.camel@sterkenils
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1292873052.1863.12.camel@sterkenils>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:24:12 , Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:57 +0200, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote:
>
> > .../...
> 1. There are no deadkeys unless specified in keyboard.tbl.
> 2. The last table in keyboard.tbl defines the deadkeys. It's similar to
> the alt-tables, but each entry consists of three bytes instead of two:

Er... last table *is* the Alt table. From &h0180 to &h01B7.
And, now that I realize... it seems a bit short... oughtn't it end at
&h01F04, with a &h2E0D sequence ? That could explain the issues... :-/

Regards,

J.-Luc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.21 SpareMiNT Packages Uploaded
Previous by thread: [MiNT] Aranym with Mint v1.17
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] No dead keys with trunk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread