[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] USERDEF stack size



Vincent Rivière wrote:
Jo Even Skarstein wrote:

This is exactly how traditional AES/VDI-bindings work. The downside is
that such bindings won't be re-entrant.


Really...
Does QED need reentrant bindings ?


A program that does not need rentrancy because it doesnt use threads
should be most comfortable with a few bindings using a static array.

So dont worry.

Let people writing multithreaded applications find the solution
they need.

OTH, I like the idee of XaAES setting up a userdef stack per
application. Shouldnt be too difficult. The AES already needs
application specific data. I wrote AHCM for that purpose, when
XaAES itself was a usermode program.
Switching to user mode looks like a good idee for the KM.

--
Groeten; Regards.
Henk Robbers. http://members.chello.nl/h.robbers
Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger;  http://digger.atari.org
A Home Cooked C compiler:      AHCC;  http://ahcc.atari.org