[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] possible gcc bug ???
> in, in how the compiler shows "long doubles". It's obviously different,
> and I'm not sure what format our m68k target is storing "long doubles"
> in, but the coldfire it seems it's IEEE double, big endian.
m68k - it uses extended precision (fmove.x fp0,fp1 for example, 96 bits = 12 bytes)
coldfire - 64bit double, as you say. I'm lazy to look into CF specs but I'd say it's because CF lacks extended precision formats.