Re: [MiNT] FreeMiNT MMU usage define

[Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>]

2011/6/14 Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>:
> Hello.
>
> In order to clean-up things I would like to totally disable the FreeMiNT MMU
> usage in mintv4e.prg (until someone writes support for the ColdFire MMU).
> Currently FreeMiNT thinks there is MMU support while there is not.
>
> Currently, the FreeMiNT MMU usage is conditioned by a #ifdef M68000 so of
> course this is not satisfying for ColdFire.
>
> I would like to use a new define to enable FreeMiNT's MMU usage. For
> example, USE_MMU would be fine. An alternative would be NO_MMU (like
> NO_RAMFS, NO_FAKE_SUPER...), but I don't like negative defines.
>
> If everyone agrees, I'm going to add -DUSE_MMU in the KERNELDEFS for all the
> kernels except 68000 and ColdFire, then test that define in the sources.
>
> --
> Vincent Rivière
>
How much work do you gauge there to be in getting MMU support for CF..

Speaking of MMU, does anyone have a kernel working with memory
protection on any system atm with current builds? I have not been able
to get MP functioning on ARAnyM with 1.17-cur or later (to update a
PACK3D install).

Paul