[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] -fstack-protector

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] -fstack-protector
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:39:45 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SihIjCLI6zBfy9hpdpioIy7Fk6XBeCC39GTcXVpJv6M=; b=JM4QLVkcpONS/2m75Rjcgk7pmveDDPLG641r6KQy8ePLpyuT38kWMBPxMXVpzIksTv zjrRZyFItoguOQbgiWvXy2O9n5XzUTcox9QxNaNmNoqjpYwJY0x5t+zz2gFXQmQEXIqn SEynPUS0Y2Usl+15HN4gmOv4vMcOl3/nymyUo=
In-reply-to: <4E92A67A.8090308@fairlite.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4E92A67A.8090308@fairlite.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10

Alan Hourihane wrote:

Aren't we missing some support in mintlib to support this option of GCC ?


Hmm, I don't remember...

Looking at my history page, I enabled -fstack-protector-all ingcc-4.5.0-mint-20100511, so I guess it should work...

I don't know how it behaves regarding to the optimization level and-fomit-frame-pointer. Maybe the libs also have to be compiled with-fstack-protector to get meaningful results...


Good luck.

--
Vincent Rivière

References:
- [MiNT] -fstack-protector
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] -fstack-protector
Next by Date: [MiNT] dynamic libs
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] -fstack-protector
Next by thread: [MiNT] dynamic libs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread