Re: [MiNT] Dopendir() return values

[Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>]

On 11/01/11 15:10, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> writes:
>
>> But that wasn't the original topic. It was explaining the return values
>> of Dopendir.
> The point is that it does not fit with existing GEMDOS practice, which
> causes confusion, obviously.
>
Not in my eyes, the point is that it's an extension.

Dopendir is a un*x'ism, so it should follow what it's trying to emulate,
otherwise applications that use it, i.e. un*x apps, will fail with
inappropriate errors.

Alan.