[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] How can evnt_multi cause an illegal access?

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] How can evnt_multi cause an illegal access?
From: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:00:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <op.wqtirnbeofd6j1@nebbiolo>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Koti
References: <CAN5rfbQuKEtMfqon0y0+YTB6fvmPoiqiSAo-ZoUtJqvPBCa0AA@mail.gmail.com> <op.wqtirnbeofd6j1@nebbiolo>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-686; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; )

Hi,

On lauantai 12 tammikuu 2013, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> Guess ev_mthicount is missing. Do you check prototypes, or is it another
> binding?

Different AES bindings specify time differently for evnt_multi().

E.g. GEMlib for GCC & VBCC uses single long whereas
SozobonX & AHCC bindings use two shorts.

	- Eero

References:
- [MiNT] How can evnt_multi cause an illegal access?
  - From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] How can evnt_multi cause an illegal access?
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Virtual Memory
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Virtual Memory
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] How can evnt_multi cause an illegal access?
Next by thread: [MiNT] PATH_MAX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread