On 02/13/13 11:27, Miro Kropáček wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no
<mailto:joska@online.no>> wrote:
If that was the case then there wouldn't be a need for
machine-specific
subdirectories. Only CPU-specific.
I disagree. Having aranym.xfs, nfstderr.xdd, nfetch.xif etc in 040
directory would annoy me pretty much, it prolongs boot time. But
you're right with the 030 case, it applies to me as well -- I've got
the SCSI-Link network card in my TT and EtherNEC in my Falcon. Now I
have to have them in the same dir... Despite this I think the current
structure (000/030/040/060/mil/ara) is fine and it reflects reality
of most setups. So even with unified kernels (030 = Falcon/TT/CT2,
040 = aranym/hades/milan/ab040, 060 = ct60/milan/hades) I'd like to
have separate machine directories at least for aranym and milan, as
these are really special hardware and most probably require modules
not usable anywhere else.
Do you have the same disk installed in your
TT/Falcon/Aranym/milan/hades ???