Re: [MiNT] Native GCC built

[p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk]

>---- Original Message ----
>From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
>To: "MiNT Mailing List" <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
>Sent: Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 2:18 PM
>Subject: Re: [MiNT] Native GCC built
>
>
>For each packages, the build script are similar, but there are sometimes 
>subtle or big differences. Projects using autoconf are usually easier to 
>compile, but they are often buggy for cross-compilation. On other 
>projects it is often a matter of changing CFLAGS, sometimes LDFLAGS... I 
>often have to use sed to search/replace a few things for proper 
>configuration. And this is the value of those scripts: a documentation 
>of the hacks required to cross-compile the packages for MiNT.
>
>-- 
>Vincent Rivière

This sounds great but I am not sure I grasp all of the implications. I guess
you are working towards a native cpu build of packages for each machine ?
Does this mean we could have 020-060 packages ?


I notice your version of samba is different to the one Alan worked on for Gentoo.
3.6.1 versus 3.6.5

http://vincent.riviere.free.fr/soft/m68k-atari-mint/archives/mint/samba/

http://gentoo.atariforge.org/files/net-fs/


Have you had any success using that version ?

Regards,

Peter