[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
From: Helmut Karlowski <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:34:00 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <5469F156.2020608@fairlite.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20141117132033.2D17C620.helmut.karlowski@ish.de> <5469F156.2020608@fairlite.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

--------------------------------------------------
Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> wrote:
(17/11/2014 14:00)

> 
> It sounds like you haven't rebuilt GCC with the new mintlib.

I've never rebuilt gcc.

I thought something like that. So everyone is forced to update their 
gcc? I don't think that #define would hurt, but anyway ...

-Helmut

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: Helmut Karlowski <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread