[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

nlink_t typedef, which is correct?

To: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu (mint)
Subject: nlink_t typedef, which is correct?
From: Stephen Usher <steve@earth.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1993 07:57:11 +0100 (BST)

In /usr/include/types.h (mntlib32) nlink_t is typedef'ed to short, whereas
in minixfs.h (part of the minix filesystem release 6.0.4) it's typedef'ed to
unsigned char.

Both of these can't be correct, which one is?

Steve
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Systems Administrator, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Oxford University.
E-Mail: steve@uk.ac.ox.earth (JANET) steve@earth.ox.ac.uk (Internet).
Tel:- Oxford (0865) 282110 (UK) or +44 865 282110 (International).

Follow-Ups:
- nlink_t typedef, which is correct?
  - From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>

Prev by Date: MiNT 1.07 patches
Next by Date: Bugs in the mntlib32 Bugs file.
Previous by thread: MiNT 1.07 patches
Next by thread: nlink_t typedef, which is correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread