Re: Julian's ps broken on 111h2 (fwd)

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>]

roemer@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de writes:

|> i've notices similar problems with the 'top'-Port from the mintutl-package.

|> First of all the first line says: ........ (idle).
|> This is because top assumes tha idle time is counted on pid 0. But _MiNT_ has
|> pid 0 (is this beacuse of the hack that forces init to have pid 1 ?)

This is ok, since MiNT *is* the idle process (it only runs if no other
process is ready).

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de              completely different"