[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sys_errlist (Re: gcc (Re: porting?))

On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Mikko Larjava wrote:

> The best sould be if I'm asked to just declare it 
> char const *const sys_errlist[];

Ok... that is what I will do, unless  someone tells me that 
in non-mbaserel cases this definition causes unwanted effects in
the assembly code.

Another thing: the way the return statement is written in
strerror(), just:


causes gcc to issue a warning about the const type being
dropped.  It's unlikely to be a serious problem, but how should
it be written to keep the compiler happy? 

When the trees are seen to be moving, the enemy is advancing.
                                              Sun Tzu 9:20