[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Sparemint and FHS

To: mint@fishpool.com (MiNT mailing list)
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Sparemint and FHS
From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 09:18:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <19990908192505Z49982-21026+427@sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no>; from Jo Even Skarstein on Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 11:20:00PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: mint@fishpool.com (MiNT mailing list)
References: <19990908192505Z49982-21026+427@sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 11:20:00PM +0200, Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
> All unix-variants look messy to me. I usually prefer the "one application -
> one directory"-approach.

Yes, it's nice.  But I also like my PATH envariable.

Ciao

Guido
-- 
http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000/ 
mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Sparemint and FHS
  - From: joska@nuts.edu (Jo Even Skarstein)

Prev by Date: RE: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b
Next by Date: [MiNT] 1.15.3b woes...
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Sparemint and FHS
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Sparemint and FHS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread