RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>]

How about making an *alternate* proposal?

The issue is that the SLB loading code needs to be able to find SLBs
according to some process-specific setting with *minimal* overhead for the
calling process.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
Of Frank Naumann
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 12:00 AM
To: MiNT List
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension


Hello!

> > Related to this: I don't see a lot of people using SLBs under MiNT if it
> > doesn't support SLBPATH to locate them.
>
> I thought about this, and I still think it's broken-by-design to
> evaluate an environment variable inside a kernel call.

I agree, very bad design ...


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de