[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:28:16 +0200
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040116

Hi!

I believe that this private mail explanation brings more light to all...
Thanks!

STan

-------------------
Hello!

Can you explain this need (to the MiNT list perhaps) in more detail? Why theVFS layer doesn't interpret the /etc/fstab as u:/etc/fstab by default?


As / refer to the root of the current drive of the current application.

This have something todo with the TOS compatibility (and because FreeMiNT
don't difference between '/' and '\' path separator).


Regards,
Frank
--------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] tw-call.app
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread