[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire

To: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:21:15 +0200
Cc: "Norman Feske" <nf2@inf.tu-dresden.de>, <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <001901c4675d$a0c2b1b0$550f63d9@blaszak> (Konrad Kokoszkiewicz's message of "Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:41:19 +0200")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <40F1519D.40604@inf.tu-dresden.de> <001901c4675d$a0c2b1b0$550f63d9@blaszak>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

"Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl> writes:

> I can't say I like this procedure (eventhough I am the author) because it
> does something that Motorola does not approve ("for future compatibility
> writes should not set these bits"). If there's some better way to
> differentiate 68030 and 68040, I am all ears.

You could try a 68040-only insn like move16 and check for the illegal
exception.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
  - From: Norman Feske <nf2@inf.tu-dresden.de>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
  - From: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
Next by Date: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT on Coldfire
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread