[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode



ons, 13,.07.2005 kl. 21.13 +0200, skrev Petr Stehlik:
> Frank Naumann píše v St 13. 07. 2005 v 20:55 +0200:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > > With the WCOWORK option, none of these assumption are true. If some code 
> > > receives a WM_SIZED message, it cannot know if the data are the FULL area or 
> > > the WORK area (because maybe another lib -- considered as the same AES 
> > > application -- may have requested the WCOWORK mode... or not.
> > 
> > I think your application have a big problem if you use a library and you 
> > don't know what the library do ... or vice versa. It's a thing you should 
> > definitly avoid if you design something.
> 
> What is wrong with you guys that you can't read what Arnaud writes. I
> haven't been programming GEM applications for ages but I still
> understand that AES messages passing coordinates from one application to
> another will misbehave if both applications won't work in same WCOWORK
> mode.

 And I have said, numerous times, it is the AES's responsibility to make
sure the app gets correct data. So, you are wrong.


Best regards
Odd Skancke