[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost

To: FreeMiNT Mailinglist <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
From: Anders Eriksson <ae@dhs.nu>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:40:32 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1121534887.13266.34.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Evan Langlois wrote:

> Nah, you may be thinking of the Jaguar.  I remember everyone bitching
> about the 16 bit bus of the Falcon when it was released.  And was it
> 16Mhz or 25Mhz?

The Falcon CPU have 16-bit, 16 MHz access to the ST-RAM.
The Videl (the Falcon shifter) has 32bit access to ST-RAM.

Many popular Falcon accelerators rise the ST-RAM speed to 20 or 25 MHz.

--
Anders Eriksson
ae@dhs.nu     http://www.dhs.nu/
ae@atari.org  http://www.atari.org/

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] recent gcc crosscompiler
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread