[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:02:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <201104101917.30771.>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com> <BANLkTik=F9+RqOE9L9tfebC=vN6Lzc5pug@mail.gmail.com> <1302454717.2318.15.camel@sterkenils> <201104101917.30771.>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:17 +0200, Jean-François Lemaire wrote:

> As far as I know, offscreen bitmaps are not implemented in fVDI either so I'm 
> surprised to hear you say zView uses them.

Are you sure about this? IIRC offscreen bitmaps has been implemented in
fVDI years ago. Atleast it wasn't an issue when I used fVDI on my
Falcon/Eclipse for a couple of years around 2000.

Jo Even

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: "Jean-François Lemaire" <jflemaire@skynet.be>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: "Jean-François Lemaire" <jflemaire@skynet.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Next by Date: [MiNT] gcc 4.5.2 bug
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread