Re: [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:18:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <201304171859.40784.oak@helsinkinet.fi>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201304171759.25316.oak@helsinkinet.fi> <516EC16A.1090408@fairlite.co.uk> <201304171859.40784.oak@helsinkinet.fi>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130412 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 04/17/13 16:59, Eero Tamminen wrote:

I'm mainly interested in TOS performance, would a patch to
shortcircuit nanosleep() to _clock() when running without
MiNT be acceptable?


Sure.

Alan.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance
  - From: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>

References:
- [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance
  - From: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTlib timing related functions behavior/performance
  - From: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>