[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug

To: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:04:47 +0200
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <517DC135.2000006@fairlite.co.uk> (Alan Hourihane's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:39:17 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <517D9717.4030009@freesbee.fr> <517DC135.2000006@fairlite.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> writes:

> I don't fully understand the original code. But I've committed a fix for
> now that gets it working.

The real bug is that <bits/dirent.h> defines _DIRENT_HAVE_D_RECLEN, but
d_reclen does not have the expected semantics.  That member should
really be named d_namlen and _DIRENT_HAVE_D_NAMLEN should be defined.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

References:
- [MiNT] scandir() bug
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] scandir() bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread