[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
From: Helmut Karlowski <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:54:31 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <5469C27B.30009@fairlite.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <op.xpfycxufofd6j1@nebbiolo.upc.de> <5469C27B.30009@fairlite.co.uk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

--------------------------------------------------
Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> wrote:
(17/11/2014 10:40)

> On 16/11/14 23:32, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> > Am 16.11.2014, 23:15 Uhr, schrieb Alan Hourihane:
> >
> >> What problem does it solve ?
> >
> > mbstate_t is multiply defined otherwise.
> >
> 
> When ? under what conditions

Are you saying it's impossible that both are included at the same 
time? Please explain.

-Helmut

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
- Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T in wchar.h?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread