[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My experience with MiNT 0.99
- To: ridderbusch.pad@sni.de (Frank Ridderbusch)
- Subject: Re: My experience with MiNT 0.99
- From: Julian F. Reschke <julian@GINA.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 16:55:41 MET DST
- Cc: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu (MiNT-Liste)
- In-reply-to: <9301251544.AA16870@nixpbe.sto.pdb.sni.de>; from "Frank Ridderbusch" at Jan 25, 93 4:44 pm
- Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, Germany Department of Mathematics
> Well, if I remember correctly, -p disables memory protection. I wouldn't
> expect any problems without mem. prot., since earlier versions also didn't
> have mem. prot.. (I didn't check thou). But if you say, that the ROM AES
> doesn't work with mem. prot., why can I work with the machine without a
> loaded GDOS. I use TOSWIN with the three ROM fonts, no problem.
Perhaps it works only partly. But you can't rely on it to work.
> My guess would be, that a GDOS trys to access some memory, that is doesn't
> own and hangs up the machine.
>
> But if your are right, would that mean, that all users (with 68030 updated
> ST's for example would need new TOS ROM's?
Why? You can disable memory protection; and MultiTOS' AES works anyway.
--
________________ cut here _________________________
Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-W4400 Muenster
eMail: julian@math.uni-muenster.de, jr@ms.maus.de
________ correct me if I'm wrong __________________