[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anyone using pl9+Falcon ?

To: binder@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
Subject: Re: Anyone using pl9+Falcon ?
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 7:38:44 CET
Cc: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
In-reply-to: <199402020932.EAA10597@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>; from "Thomas Binder" at Feb 2, 94 10:32 am

Thomas Binder writes:

> > I've had a report that 1.08 and Minixfs pl9 crash on a Falcon. Can anyone
> > confirm this? It seems to be an update daemon problem.
> > Steve.
> > 
> Well, I'm using 1.09 and pl9 on my Falcon, I haven't had any problems yet.
> Maybe only with MiNT 1.08?

 no falcon here, but this reminds me...  i have observed that programs
running on minixfs apparently need a bigger stack (_stksize) sometimes!
is it true that the kernel or filesystems still use user processes stack?
shouldn't they have their own?

 curious...
	Juergen
-- 
J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
								...ohne Gewehr
PGP public key fingerprint =  8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12  1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA

References:
- Re: Anyone using pl9+Falcon ?
  - From: Thomas Binder (Gryf) <binder@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>

Prev by Date: Centronics device driver
Next by Date: cross-gcc
Previous by thread: Re: Anyone using pl9+Falcon ?
Next by thread: Setting up a cross-compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread